By Muhammad Faisal, Editorial team 8 min read Updated
People who follow the Ahl-e-Hadith orientation — often called Ghair Muqallid in Pakistan — are regularly told that inheritance "works differently" for them. For the overwhelming majority of estates that is simply not true, and the reason is worth understanding. The calculator now offers this as an option alongside the four schools and shows every position side by side, so you can see for yourself exactly where the answers part company.
The method, stated plainly
The starting point is a refusal to bind oneself to one school's settled doctrine. A ruling is taken from the Qur'an and the authentic Sunnah directly; where the Companions differed, the view judged to rest on the stronger evidence is preferred, whichever school later adopted it.
In most fields that produces a lot of divergence. In inheritance it produces almost none, and here is why: the shares are explicit text. The half, the quarter, the eighth, the two thirds, the third and the sixth are all named in the Qur'an, in verses 4:11, 4:12 and 4:176. There is very little left for anyone to reason their way to a different answer about.
So a widow takes an eighth where there are children. A single daughter with no brother takes a half. Maternal half-siblings divide a third equally, a brother and a sister alike. None of that changes. If you read the main guide to Islamic inheritance law, essentially all of it applies.
Where the answer can change
The disagreements are not new and they are not sectarian. They are disagreements between the Companions, recorded centuries ago, and every one of the four schools also had to choose between them. Ibn Rushd sets them out clearly in Bidayat al-Mujtahid, in the book of inheritance, which is the fairest place to read all sides.
1. The grandfather competing with brothers
A man dies leaving his father's father and two full brothers, and no children. Does the grandfather stand in the father's place and exclude the brothers, or does he share with them?
The position reported from Abu Bakr and from Ibn Abbas is that he excludes them. The position of Zayd b. Thabit is that they share, with the grandfather taking whichever is best for him of an equal brother's portion, a third of the residue, or a sixth of the estate.
The Hanafi school followed the first. The Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali schools followed Zayd. This calculator's Ahl-e-Hadith option follows the first as well, which is why its column matches Hanafi here and not the other three.
| Position | Grandfather | Two brothers |
|---|---|---|
| Abu Bakr, Ibn Abbas — and Hanafi | The whole estate | Nothing |
| Zayd b. Thabit — and Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali | 1/3 | 2/3 |
There is a knock-on effect worth knowing. Al-Akdariyya, the famously awkward case that produces a denominator of 27, only arises at all if the grandfather shares with the sister. On the first position it never forms.
2. Awl — when the shares add up to more than the estate
Sometimes the fixed shares claim more than the whole estate. The remedy all four schools use is awl: raise the denominator and reduce everyone in the same proportion. That is the position taken under Umar, and it is what our guide to awl and radd describes.
Ibn Abbas rejected it. His view was that the shortfall should not be spread across everyone; the heirs whose entitlement is capable of being reduced should bear it, rather than reducing a share the text fixes absolutely. It is a minority view, but it is a Companion's view, and it is recorded.
This calculator applies awl in every position, including the Ahl-e-Hadith one. Ibn Abbas's alternative is not built in. That is a deliberate decision, flagged on every affected result, and it is one of the things we want a qualified reviewer to rule on.
3. Mushtaraka — the husband, the mother and two sets of siblings
A woman dies leaving a husband, her mother, two maternal half-brothers and two full brothers. The fixed shares — a half, a sixth, a third — consume the whole estate exactly, and the full brothers, who inherit only as residuaries, are left with nothing.
Ali held that this is simply the outcome: they take nothing. Umar is reported to have let the full brothers share the maternal siblings' third with them, reasoning that they share the same mother. The Hanafi and Hanbali schools took the first; the Maliki and Shafi'i took the second.
This calculator's Ahl-e-Hadith option takes Ali's view. That is a choice, not a certainty, and the comparison table on your result will show you both outcomes.
4. A surviving spouse as the only heir — we got this wrong, and corrected it
A woman dies leaving only her husband. He takes his half. What happens to the other half?
This calculator used to give it to him under the Ahl-e-Hadith option, on a report from Uthman of giving left-over wealth to a husband. That was wrong, and we found it by going and reading the source instead of relying on what is commonly said.
Ibn Qudamah, in al-Mughni, deals with that very report:
With regard to the spouses, what is left over should not be given to them, according to the consensus of the scholars, but it was narrated from Uthman that he did give the left-over wealth to the husband, but perhaps he was a relative on the father's side or on the mother's side, so he gave that to him, or he gave it from the bayt al-mal and not by way of inheritance.
So the single report the old behaviour rested on is explained away by the same authority, against a reported consensus. The husband now takes his half, and the remainder is reported as undistributed — the same as all four schools.
Worth noting where this leaves things: with that corrected, this option now produces exactly the same figures as the Hanafi school on every case we test. That is an honest outcome rather than a disappointing one. The remaining differences are matters of which Companion's view is preferred, and on the two that are still open — the grandfather, and Mushtaraka — the choices here happen to coincide with Hanafi too.
What we have not verified — read this before relying on any of it
We are being deliberately direct here, because the alternative would be dishonest.
The four points above are genuine, documented disagreements among the Companions. That part is solid, and Bidayat al-Mujtahid will show you all sides of each.
Two of the four have since been checked against sources and settled. Awl is applied by everybody — Ibn Qudamah records that nobody in his day held Ibn Abbas's view, and nobody has revived it. Radd to a sole spouse is settled the other way, and correcting it changed this calculator's output, as described above.
The other two — the grandfather, and Mushtaraka — we have not confirmed. The choices built into this calculator are the ones most commonly attributed, and they may well be right, but we are not citing a fatwa for them, we have not put them to anyone qualified in this orientation, and we are not going to pretend otherwise by attaching an impressive-looking reference to something we have not checked.
So every result produced under this option carries a notice saying exactly that, and the comparison table shows you all five positions rather than one. If you are qualified to settle any of these, please write to us — your name and credentials would be published with the correction. If you think a specific answer is wrong, report it.
Common questions
Is Ahl-e-Hadith a fifth school?
No, and its adherents would not describe it as one. The calculator offers it as a separate option because people ask for it by name, not because it is being treated as a madhhab.
If the shares are in the Qur'an, why does any of this arise?
Because the text fixes the fractions but not every combination of relatives. A grandfather beside brothers, or shares that total more than the estate, are situations the verses do not spell out, and reasoning has to bridge the gap. That is where the Companions differed, and where the schools follow them.
Which option should I pick in the calculator?
Pick what your family follows. Whichever you choose, the result shows every other position beside it, so you can see immediately whether your case is one where it makes any difference at all. In most families it makes none.
Does this change anything for a daughter or a widow?
No. On every case we test, this option gives the same figures as the Hanafi school — see the daughter's share and the wife's share, which apply unchanged.
Open the calculator and compare all five positions on your own case.
Work out your own case
Enter the surviving heirs and see each share, with the reason for it.
Open the calculatorRelated guides
-
Who is excluded from Islamic inheritance
Relatives who expected a share and received nothing always want to know why. The answer is almost never arbitrary: Faraid has a precise set of exclusion rules…
-
Awl and radd explained
Add up the fixed shares in a real estate and they often do not come to exactly one. Sometimes they claim more than the whole estate; sometimes they leave a…
-
Difference between Hanafi and Shafi'i inheritance
People often assume that choosing a school changes the whole calculation. It almost never does. The shares are explicit Qur'anic text, so for the overwhelming…